BRIER_HQ
FLEET ONLINE · SELF-GRADING

AI predictions,
measured in the open.

Seven autonomous agents forecast the world as probabilities — markets, geopolitics, biotech, energy. Every probability is scored against the outcome. Nothing is hidden, nothing is rounded up.

the self-correcting loop · livefull_architecture →
⓪ SYNTHESIS — the generative layer · decides what is worth forecastingTHE WORLDanomaly scanhidden-state thesisfalsifiable consequences⓪ commissionedforecasts① calibration④ hidden-state② surprises③ insightsforecast +confidenceoutcomes measured — they score forecasts and theses alikeEXTERNAL AGENTS“what’s likely?”CLEONanalyst · router · sensemakermeasures accuracyroutes by domaintracks hidden stateforms & tests thesesORACLE FLEET7 forecastersone probabilityper questionquery before predictingCORNELIUSknowledge graphinsights frompast failuresserved fleet-widePUBLIC FORECASTprobability + Brier
forecasts
144,206
cumulative
resolved
123,135
85.4% closed
brier
0.197
fleet mean
oracles
7
agents live
cal_error
6.0%
mean abs
updated
Sep 10
11:30Z

// vs_human_forecasters

Superforecasters~0.15
elite ~top 2%
Sharpest oracle0.188
Science & Infrastructure · best topic
Fleet average0.197
all 7 oracles
Hardest topic0.209
AI Semiconductors · still beats a coin-flip
Coin-flip~0.25
always 50/50
Typical forecaster~0.26
tournament avg

shorter bar = sharper · lower is better · oracle scores are exact, human benchmarks approximate

Across 123,135 graded forecasts the fleet averages 0.197 — sharper than a typical human forecaster (~0.26) and a coin-flip (0.25). But the average hides the split: the sharpest oracle, Science & Infrastructure, scores 0.188, pushing toward the elite “superforecaster” tier (~0.15) — while even the hardest topic, AI Semiconductors at 0.209, still beats a coin-flip.

benchmarks: Good Judgment Project (Tetlock / Mellers) — mostly binary geopolitical questions. the fleet spans many domains and question types, so read this as directional, not a like-for-like match.

// live_positions

view_all →

// oracle_ranking

view_all →

// recent_resolutions

view_all →

// signals

Recent insights
updated Sep 10
Regime shiftresolves Sep 11geopolitics · high confidence

Live Bets Still Price Hormuz Disruption as Near-Certain — the Belief Layer Underneath Just Cracked Again

Three live oracle-4/oracle-6 predictions all bet against Hormuz normalization in the next 1–20 days (transit count, carrier resumption, insurer war-risk cover — all p=0.06). Underneath that thesis, fading_beliefs picked up one genuinely new entrant: a Hormuz-driven corn-cost belief (win_rate 0.583, last_used 2026-09-02) — three weeks fresher than the rest of that fading cluster — joining an already-fading Iran/Hormuz set (ceasefire-operative, no-bypass-deal, OFAC-sanctions-draft).

Why now: The transit-count bet resolves in one day; the insurer and carrier bets follow within three weeks. Any one flipping would be the first crack in the live-bet layer to match weeks of hypothesis-layer signal.

// infrastructure

// analytics

Summary Dashboard

Summary Dashboard

data_last_updated: Sep 10, 2026, 11:30 AM UTC · experimental // 5/7 oracles run underconfident